When a police officer demanded that she cover her hair, Amira Osman Hamed
simply refused.
"I'm Muslim, and I'm not going to cover my head," she declared. For
that, the 35-year-old Sudanese engineer was arrested last August and
charged with "indecent dress."
Now Hamed faces a possible sentence of 40 lashes if a court convicts her
when she faces the judge on Monday. Still, she refuses to wear a headscarf.
Hamed's determination to
challenge arbitrary rules restricting women's freedom is part of a wave
of energy pushing against those limits, notably (but not exclusively) in
Muslim countries. In Muslim-majority states in Africa, South Asia, the
Persian Gulf and elsewhere, women are relentlessly demanding more equal
treatment.
To some, the matter of
whether or not to cover one's hair may seem like a trivial issue. But
the right to decide what one wears is a basic freedom. And strict rules
by the government or by religious authorities dictating women's attire
are almost always the tip of the iceberg -- the most visible portion of a
structure that constricts women's freedom, taking away their right to
make other important choices about their own lives.
Hamed herself has already
pushed back. In 2002, the human rights activist was arrested and
convicted under the same law. She paid a fine for the crime of wearing
pants in public.
In 2009, the ban against
trousers snagged the journalist Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein and 12 other
women in a Khartoum restaurant, all wearing slacks. Several pleaded
guilty, paid a fine, and were flogged for their crime. Al-Hussein
refused. She was so outraged that she sent out invitations to her trial
and to her possible flogging. In the end, the Sudanese Journalists Union
paid the fine, but al-Hussein did not waver.
A few weeks ago, police were recorded lashing a woman in the street for getting into a car with a man. The images are chilling.
Frida Ghitis
Sudanese women, she
pointed out, are getting swept up under the infamous article 152 of
Sudan's 1991 Criminal Code. In the country ruled by an Islamist party
with its own interpretation of Sharia, Islamic law, the rules are strict
but conveniently vague.
The statute calls for
punishment of up to 40 lashes for anyone committing an "indecent act" or
wearing an "obscene outfit." Not surprisingly, the law is used mostly
against women. Government figures for 2008 said 43,000 women were
arrested for clothing-related offenses in the capital alone.
And the cases keep
coming. A few weeks ago, police were recorded lashing a woman in the
street for getting into a car with a man. The images are chilling.
The extraordinary
displays of courage from women challenging restrictions on their lives
include the case of Malala Yousafzai -- the Pakistani girl who nearly
died after Taliban gunmen shot her in the face -- and other young girls,
like Yemen's
Nujood Ali, divorced at the age of 10 and now a campaigner against child marriage, and thousands of others.
Nobody, however, has
gained the fame of Malala, whose call for girls to receive an education
crossed the line for those who think women should remain subservient,
with society under the full control of men.
Her courage frightens the Taliban.
Some in Pakistan claim
that Malala, now a celebrity, is a product of the West. But these
outbreaks of courage, these rumblings for change, are coming from within
the Muslim world. Muslim women do not need the West to tell them that
inequality and second-class status for women are unacceptable.
The rules enforcing
inequality are often couched as religious mandate, but they are mostly
the product of deeply traditional societies. The societies, however, are
changing. Women are part of those societies, and many accept the
restrictions -- but not everyone is happy with the status quo.
Consider Saudi Arabia.
In most parts of the kingdom, many women, depending on the regions where
they live, are required to cover themselves from head to toe, wearing
the niqab, a veil that covers even the face, essentially erasing a
woman's identity while she is in public. Most Saudi women are accustomed
to wearing it. For now, those demanding change are focusing on other
areas.
Saudi women chafe under
many rules. One of the best known is an unwritten ban on their right to
drive. Last weekend, a group of women in Saudi Arabia defied the
stunningly anachronistic rule that puts Saudi misogyny in a category of
its own.
Saudi women have fought
for years to gain the right to drive. In 2011, when they thought they
might have something like a Saudi Women's Spring, echoing the popular
revolutions in the region, activists organized the Women2Drive day. Many
were arrested after they took to the road.
Despite the arrests, they tried it again last weekend. Some men raised an outcry. Others cheered.
Two Saudi men, wearing
their traditional red kaffiyehs, created an Internet sensation with the
parody song "No Woman, No Drive," mocking the driving ban with a takeoff
on the Bob Marley hit "No Woman, No Cry." The video has had millions of
hits, with lyrics that introduce viewers to the absurd logic of the
ban, such as one Saudi cleric's contention that driving could damage
women's ovaries and threaten their fertility.
The inability to drive
creates a host of practical problems for Saudi women -- problems that
make them even more beholden to the whims of men.
But other rules are even more offensive,
such as the one that prohibits a Saudi woman from leaving the house,
working, studying, traveling, even receiving medical treatment without
the permission of a male "guardian," usually her husband, father, or
brother -- or even a son.
Not all Muslim countries
impose terrible restrictions on women, and not all countries with
profound inequality between the sexes are Muslim. But
the worst countries in which to be a woman,
according to the World Economic Forum's Gender Gap Report, are almost
all Muslim-majority states in Africa, the Gulf, and South Asia.
Luckily, those are also
countries where women are fighting back, pushing to close the gap, armed
with the conviction that the restrictions they face are not mandated by
their religion, but by social norms that are subject to change.
And that change, a call
for human rights for all -- including for women -- is not an invention
of the West. It is what a woman like Amira Osman Hamed demands when she
says she is a Muslim, and she simply will not be told what to wear.
No comments:
Post a Comment